About this Blog

Monday, March 4, 2013

Insurrection and The Immortal Diamond!


I've just read two books which, while very different, are essentially making the same point - at least some of the time! That converging point is that living in light of the Resurrection is not about debating an historical event but participating as co-creators of resurrection in every area of life now.

Pete Rollins does this in a deliberately "incendiary" way. Listen to his own short introduction to his book Insurrection: to believe is human; to doubt, divine.

I found this book very challenging - and thought provoking. I'm still mulling over whether I'd go as far as he did on some points but I plan to read more of his writing.


Richard Rohr's book Immortal Diamond: the search for our true self  is written for a different purpose but returns many times to the theme that resurrection life (life lived from the "true self") is a life of participation. "Some of the most exciting and fruitful theology today is being described as the turn towards participation. ...It constantly recognizes that we are part of something more than we are observing something. The turn towards participation now sees that most of religious and church history has been largely preoccupied with religious ideas, about which you could be wrong or right. When it is all about ideas, you did not have to be part of 'it'; you just needed to talk correctly about 'it'. You never had to dive in and illustrate that spiritual proof is only in the pudding. You never had to go to Russia; you just needed a correct map of Russia and the willingness to say, "My map is better than your map," or more commonly, "Mine is the only true map," without offering any corroborating evidence that your map has in fact gotten you there." p108f (italics in original)

Rohr takes the reader more gently on a journey from familiar territory to challenging places that in many ways are similar to where Rollins arrives. With Rohr's book it may feel more like being coaxed out of an old confining chrysalis than Rollins' radical burning of the bridges you've just walked over! I'd love to hear an interview between Rohr and Rollins. I think they would agree on a great deal - but I'm not sure it would be everything.

Both books are well worth reading - but there's a "right time" for everything!

Monday, February 11, 2013

Walking backwards off the edge!


(I'm doing a bit of an archaeological dig into articles and poetry written years ago. Somehow this article seemed to fit with the White Water Rafting of the previous post!)

Walking backwards off the edge!

I must be very careful of the illustrations I use when leading a retreat! Recently I talked about abseiling as an picture of trust and surrender. I was quoting from Parker Palmer whose own experience of abseiling had been a salutary lesson in faith. It was a great illustration - written with humour, yet taking seriously the spiritual challenge embedded in the physical experience.

I suppose I should have guessed that someone would ask me if I'd ever tried it myself! "Well, no actually, I haven't. I watch other people abseiling quite often though - almost every day I walk past a recreation centre where they teach outdoor pusuits. So I can see how safe it is and it looks like fun!" Having put it like that I could hardly back out when my friend admitted it hadn't felt like fun the one time she'd tried it and asked me to go with her to have another try - this time as a conscious expression of trust. So with a slightly sinking feeling I agreed.

Part of me hoped she would just forget about it. After all learning vicariously from someone else's experience is good enough isn't it? Alas, she was serious! A few weeks later we were booked in to actually do it!

Our instructor was great. He found out about us and our past experience - one with a bad experience and one with none! He talked us through every detail of the harness, the ropes, the helmet, the safety rope he would hold and the way to walk backwards off the edge! The only thing left was to do it. His final word was: "Trust the equipment. It will hold you. If you slip, or even just want to pause on the way down I will hold you steady with the safety rope. Trust me!"  We assured him that trust was exactly the name of the game!

And so I walked backwards off the edge  (yes, that is me in the photo!) - leaning out into the harness, letting out the rope at my own pace and looking up at the instructor calling out encouraging words! It was a challenge - especially that first step over the edge. But the equipment and the intsructor were trustworthy and once I knew that from experience it was fun! We had two descents each and left feeling both exhilarated and thoughtful.

Walking backwards off the edge is a crazy thing to do without the right equipment and a competent instructor. When both are there, however, it may be the best way down to a new level of faith. The Christian pathway isn't always through green pastures and beside still waters. Often enough it  leads to apparently insurmountable cliffs and crevasses that seem to disappear into an abyss. We are used to walking forwards seeing the next step and choosing it carefully. Walking backwards goes against our strong desire to stay in control. What's more we are used to walking on the horizontal plane. "I'm not designed for vertical descent," we gasp, as life tips us totally out of our comfort zone. Walking backwards off the edge disorients us. It gives us a stark choice: Trust and descend safely to a new level of being or stay in control  on the familiar flat land.

The faith equipment that will hold us needs to be carefully put on piece by piece before we reach the top of the cliff so that at that "first step over the edge" moment we have confidence in what we are leaning into. Walking backwards means our eyes are free to watch the Instructor who encourages every trusting step and promises to hold us steady even if we slip. Faith is a challenge - and the exhilaration of surrendering to it cannot be felt vicariously. 

While we were abseiling on one part of the wall a group of young children were going down alongside us and we were told that earlier in the day people in wheelchairs had been enabled to abseil too!  Trusting, like abseiling, is not reserved for the mature or the strong. Trusting is about leaning back and knowing you will be held. Sometimes children and the disabled  know more about this than most of us!

(PS In case you are wondering: no I haven't been bungy jumping and I have definitely decided never to use it as an illustration!)

Thursday, January 31, 2013

Elephant TV

Thanks to Dale (whose Blog I follow) I have just found out about Elephant TV. As far as I can tell it is a TEAR Fund initiative to have informed discussions about "contentious issues in the Church so that Christians can come to informed and thoughtful conclusions and respect each other despite our differences of opinion." The full panel discussions are available for rent at $1.99 or to buy at $3.99. The previews I've looked at have definitely whetted my appetite. Current topics available: Evolution/Creation; Same sex marriage; Is war ever justified... While browsing the site I came upon an interview with Paul Young author of The Shack. You can listen to the whole interview here by scrolling down past the preview of the session on war which features Dr. Chris Marshall and one of the Waihopai three who disarmed the US spy base here in NZ.

I think this site is a wonderful resource for individuals or groups to hear people respectfully but strongly talking about things which are often the avoided "elephants in the room".

Wednesday, January 16, 2013

Junk music? Maybe not!

                    "The world sends us garbage. We send back music."
-Favio Chavez Orchestra Director

Thanks to a friend sharing this You Tube link I'm sharing it with you.
It is inspirational and only takes a few minutes to watch.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fXynrsrTKbI&feature=plcp




Tuesday, January 15, 2013

Fire!


With all the devastating fires in Australia - and some here in NZ too - fire is on our minds at present. It is both essential - and dangerous when out of hand. I can't imagine life without fire. According to an interesting Wikipedia article on fire we've been depending on it for 420 million years!





But my real point in this post is a quote from another book I am currently working through: The New Spiritual Exercises in the Spirit of Pierre Teilhard de Chardin. by Louis Savary

"Teilhard connects the image of fire with love in an evolutionary prayer: 'Someday after mastering the wind, the waves, the tides and gravity, we shall harness for God the energies of love, and then, for the second time in the history of the world, man will have discovered fire.'"








The fire of love is the one kind of fire that does no damage at all no matter how far and wide it spreads. It only takes a match, a spark, a candle to start a fire.
Let's all be fire-lighters of love!

Sunday, January 6, 2013

Cardboard bicycle for $20

This post is rather a change from the last one! But I happened on this story on the Yahoo website while checking my mail - and it is really inspiring. It is not only the creative genius of the inventor but his desire to give aid in a variety of ways from his creation. For the whole fascinating story click here.




Israeli inventor Izhar Gafni holds his cardboard bicycle as he poses for a photo in Moshav Ahituv, central Israel September 24, 2012. The bicycle, made almost entirely of cardboard, has the potential to change transportation habits from the world's most congested cities to the poorest reaches of Africa, Gafni, an expert in designing automated mass-production lines and an amateur cycling enthusiast, says. Picture taken September 24, 2012. REUTERS/Baz Ratner



Friday, January 4, 2013

My New Year reading

They say you know a lot about a person by looking at their bookshelf. I'm sure that's true! But in our house it depends which bookshelf you look at. Which is really to say that this post is not intended to represent a balanced overview of my reading material!

For Christmas 2012 I gave "hints" about books I would like to receive and was delighted to acquire two of them:

Just Call Me Lopez is a novel about the life of Ignatius of Loyola written by Margaret Silf. Since Ignatian spirituality is the tradition in which I was trained as a spiritual director it holds a place very close to my heart. Margaret Silf is an author and a person I admire. So the combination was irresistible. I'm still reading this one and enjoying the way Silf brings Ignatius (also known as Lopez) "down to earth". The events of his life and the discoveries now enshrined in The Spiritual Exercises are woven together in an easy to read way.


It is in more recent years  that I have discovered the writing and speaking of the recent Archbishop of Canterbury, Rowan Williams. I am captivated by his ability to speak deeply and thoughtfully on so many topics - from CS Lewis's Narnia books, to the intricacies of the theology of Church councils, to the history of spirituality.
So when I saw advertised a book subtitled The Theology of Rowan Williams by Mike Higton, I was hooked! The title Difficult Gospel is intriguing and is quickly revealed to refer to the difficult-to-believe good news of God's unconditional love - and the implications of that love. Higton is excellent at distilling Williams's often complex thinking into a clarity that is no less compelling and challenging.

I couldn't wait for Christmas for this third book. Brian McLaren is one of my all time favourite writers. Despite its torturously long title, the theme is one I am delighted to see explored by someone who has gently drawn many people into a more and more inclusive faith journey without in any way having to deny their Christian roots. Why did Jesus, Moses, the Buddha and Mohammed Cross the Road is more readily understood by its subtitle: Christian Identity in a Multi-faith World. 

I am reading all of these books concurrently! On one recent morning both of the latter two books said a similar thing in different ways. That seemed like a strong flag waving: "Take Notice!" The point expressed very simply is this: Instead of saying (and thinking) "Jesus is like God", it is important to say "God is like Jesus". At first glance that seems a bit self-evident . What is the difference? There is a big difference as both authors make clear. McLaren says: "So where the popular approach takes a pre-existing definition of God and applies it to Christ, this alternative approach challenges the preconceived understandings of God and revises them in the light of Christ. This assertion shifts the emphasis from 'what is true of God is true of Christ' to 'what is true of Christ is true of God'. Or, more simply put from 'Christ is like God' to 'God is like Christ'." p130 (Italics mine.)

Mike Higton is talking about Williams' view that many people put obedience to a God they believe can choose to love or choose to command violence, over an understanding of God framed by the life of Jesus where love goes "all the way down". In the first view "power trumps love". In the second view "love trumps power" every time. Quoting Higton: "The word 'God' in Christian theology does not name a being or reality of unfettered power, who has chosen to love - it does not, that is, name a reality in which power goes deeper than love. Rather it names a reality for whom - if I amy put it like this - love goes all the way down. In the Christian picture, God's power always and only emerges from God's love - God's will from God's loving nature - and so love trumps power every time. There is no shadow of power without love in God." p39

I think the sentence I have italicized in McLaren's quote is the heart of what both authors are saying.

Wednesday, December 26, 2012

from Cynthia Bourgeault


(This post is originally from the Contemplative Society's Blog)

As we celebrate this season of mystery, and at the end of a year which seems to have dissolved into tragic chaos, it is good to reaffirm the spiritual reality in which we journey.
Here are words from Cynthia Bourgeault’s Sounds True Audio Learning Course “Encountering the Wisdom Jesus,” 2005 in which she calls us back to the heart of the spiritual life.
********************
What do we make of our human task here? Some traditions say that we’re here to be good, to engage in spiritual warfare to mind our ‘p’s’ and ‘q’s’ so later we have the right to go home to where we’ve come from. Some traditions will say that we’re here to work off past karma and that when we have finally worked off our past karma   and emerged whole and fused in our being, we can leave this endless cycle of birth and death and heaviness and density.
But the gist is always the same. Wherever you go in spiritual tradition it seems that here is not home, that our task is somehow to realize our way out of the illusory bonds and get back to where we belong.  That message is filtered to us even through our Christian tradition where heaven has come to represent so much that place that we go to after we die if we’re good.
But is there another way of looking at this?
I believe there is. And I believe this is actually what is at the heart of that beautiful intimation “For God so loved the world.”
Yes this is a very heavy frustrating difficult density. It seems as if by the very binary finite nature of the mind that we’re always bumping into sharp edges. It seems that our walk in time is diminishment. We are always having to choose. To do one thing means we can’t do something else. To love one person means we can’t love another. And our sharp edges, our boundaries as human beings bump against each other and we age. And we diminish. And we finally have our hearts broken. It’s a hard place. It’s a frustrating place. It’s a difficult place.
We come into constriction. But is that as punishment? I believe not. I believe it’s as sacrament.
“I was a hidden treasure and I longed to be known.
And so I created the realms.”
In this realm, by its very dense nature, by its very dualistic, binary, jagged-edged nature, it becomes specifically the dimension to express certain aspects of the being of the Divine that can only be expressed in these boundaried conditions. It shows us what love is like in a certain terribly particular and intense way. It accentuates those dimensions of divine love in which love becomes costly and therefore becomes precious.
So the very sharp edges that we experience as constriction are in fact the opportunity to show forth some of the exquisite dimensions of the nature of love that can only be manifest in finitude.
Since love requires your heart being broken, we begin to see qualities such as steadfastness, tenderness, commitment, forebearance, fidelity. These beautiful subtle savours of what love is like have no real context where there’s no edges and boundaries, when all just flows. But when you run up against the hard edge and have to stand in love anyway, what comes forth is a most precious nectar of the quality of divine being.
I’ve sometimes said, and I don’t mean this entirely in jest, that the most profound product of this world is tears. Tears express that vulnerability when we can  stand having our heart broken, and still love. In the tears flows out a sweetness, a warm-heartedness to the Divine which has been known in our tradition as the divine mercy, the divine compassion.
This is the realm, I believe, in which this mercy, this compassion is most deeply, harrowingly, excruciatingly, and beautifully released.
That’s our business down here. That’s what we’re up to.
And I think this has some very important implications.
It’s not about punishment.  It’s not about coming down here as a sort of high school or proving ground for further rewards. But right here and now, we are in the process of co-creating with God the manifestations, the revelation of God’s most secret and intimate name, the heart of God. That’s a difficult assignment. In some way we chose it. We elected or consented to be part of it.
And so, in a sense our deepest opportunity is not to look at how we can get out, how we can get home, just as for Jesus, crucifixion wasn’t the hard thing, Incarnation is, so for us. And to realize in some conscious or deeply trans-conscious way, we are bearing our part in the suffering of God, in the suffering, the costliness that’s involved in the full manifestation of the Divine Name, of the Divine Love. And we’re doing it right here and now, and that these conditions as fragile and as frustrating as they are, are precisely and perfectly the only conditions in which that love can be fully manifest.

Monday, December 17, 2012

Who would have thought...

Over the weeks of Advent I have been listening to the daily Pray-as-you-go meditations - an excellent Jesuit resource for daily prayer. This morning the reading was the genealogy of Jesus from Matthew 1. At first I thought it was a very strange reading to feature - who wants to listen to a string of names about who "begat" whom! But what struck me as I listened was how, in the very lineage of Jesus, God made sure that the outcasts, the lost and the broken were given a crucial role. The women that are named or alluded to (in the list of mainly male names) each have a poignant history:
Tamar - a widow, abandoned by the father-in-law who should have cared for her, whom she then deceived into having sex with her which produced the child in Jesus' lineage. (See Genesis 38)
Rahab - a Canaanite prostitute who saved the Jewish spies (and her own skin!) by hiding them when they were checking out Jericho before the Israelites destroyed it. (See Joshua 2 and 6:22-25)
Ruth - another widow, who left home and travelled into completely unknown territory (where she would be considered an alien) to support her mother-in-law. Her courage is recorded in a whole book named after her!
"The wife of Uriah"- not even named -  'used' by a so called godly leader and then her having true husband murdered to hide the adulterous deed. (See 2 Samuel 11-12)
And finally Mary - a teenage single Mum from a poor family.


The way these women are carefully woven into the genealogy says we are meant to take them seriously, to know their stories, to see that they were essential to the coming of Jesus.


Yes, shocking as it sounds, without the part played by women whose lives included incest, prostitution, alienation, adultery and poverty we would not be celebrating Christmas.



Tuesday, December 11, 2012

A Christmas Smile

I have been thinking I really should Blog some inspiring Advent reflection - but nothing came to mind!! Then someone sent me the link to this delightful re-telling of the Christmas story by Year one (5 year old) girls from Dio school. Do watch it with a smile - and notice some thought provoking lines. Click here.